Andrew Beck

My feedback

  1. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      Andrew Beck commented  · 

      Having this option would make designs in industrial areas much cleaner. Right now we are designing equipment to homerun either (1) from the equipment itself or (2) from a junction box that feeds other equipment with the same conductor size. In reality, we'd be using a junction box with multiple wire sizes in the homerun, so our current designs are misleading.

      Andrew Beck supported this idea  · 
    • 7 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
        Andrew Beck commented  · 

        To add to this: we'd like a separate circuit callout and homerun callout layer. Since the looping options apply to all device types, we are unable to show homerun + circuit callouts for receptacles while only showing homeruns for lighting. Having separate layers for homerun and circuit callouts would address this.

      • 3 votes
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          Andrew Beck shared this idea  · 
        • 148 votes
          Vote
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            Signed in as (Sign out)
            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
            Andrew Beck commented  · 

            I know "branch wires" are mentioned in the wish description, but it would also be nice if feeder wires were upsized based on voltage drop.

          • 26 votes
            Vote
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              Signed in as (Sign out)
              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
              Andrew Beck supported this idea  · 
            • 229 votes
              Vote
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                Signed in as (Sign out)
                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                Andrew Beck supported this idea  · 
              • 10 votes
                Vote
                Sign in
                Check!
                (thinking…)
                Reset
                or sign in with
                • facebook
                • google
                  Password icon
                  Signed in as (Sign out)
                  You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                  Andrew Beck shared this idea  · 
                • 25 votes
                  Vote
                  Sign in
                  Check!
                  (thinking…)
                  Reset
                  or sign in with
                  • facebook
                  • google
                    Password icon
                    Signed in as (Sign out)
                    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                    Andrew Beck commented  · 

                    DesignMaster currently loops devices using arcs. We'd like an option to change looping from using arcs to use polylines (we differentiate between MC cable and conduits with arcs and polylines, respectively). Ideally these polylines would offset themselves similar to how feeder polylines are offset during one-line generation.

                  Feedback and Knowledge Base